你可以看看这个~~~
To me March 28th was a lucky day. It was on that particular
evening that I found myself at central stage, in the spotlight. Winning the "21st Century·Ericsson Cup" Seventh National English Speaking Competition is a memory that I shall treasure and one that will surely stay.
More important than winning the Cup is the friendship that has been established and developed among the contestants, and the chance to communicate offstage in addition to competing
onstage. Also the competition helps boost public speaking in China, a skill hitherto undervalued. For me, though, the competition is a more personal experience.
Habitually shy, I had been reluctant to take part in any such
activities. Encouraged by my friends, however, I made a
last-minute decision to give it a try. In the course of
preparation I somehow rediscovered myself, a truer me.
I found that, after all, I like communicating with other
people; that exchanging views can be so much fun—and so much
rewarding, both emotionally and intellectually; that public
speaking is most effective when you are least guarded; and
that it is essential to success in every walk of life.
At a more practical level, I realized knowing what you are
going to say and how you are going to say it are equally
important. To take the original ideas out of your head and
transplant them, so to speak, to that of others, you need to
have an organized mind. This ability improves with training.
Yet there should not be any loss or addition or distortion in
the process. Those ideas that finally find their way into
another head need to be recognizably yours. Language is a
means to transmit information, not a means to obstruct
communication. It should be lucid to be penetrating.
In China, certain public speaking skills have been unduly
emphasized. Will it really help, we are compelled to ask, to
bang at the podium or yell at the top of your lungs, if you
have come with a poorly organized speech, a muddled mind, and
unwillingness to truly share your views?
Above all, the single most important thing I learnt was that
as a public speaker, you need to pay attention, first and
foremost, to the content of your speech. And second, the
structure of your speech: how one idea relates and progresses
to another.
Only after these come delivery and non-verbal communication:
speed control, platform manner, and so on. Pronunciation is
important, yet of greater importance is this: Is your language
competent enough to express your ideas exactly the way you
intend them to be understood?
I was informed afterwards that I was chosen to be the winner
for my "appropriately worded speech, excellent presence and
quick-witted response". In so remarking, the judges clearly
showed their preference: they come to listen for meaningful
ideas, not for loose judgments, nor easy laughters.
Some contestants failed to address their questions head on.
Some were able to, but did not know where to stop—the dragging
on betrayed their lack of confidence. The root cause was that
they did not listen attentively to the questions. Or they were
thinking of what they had prepared.
As I said in my speech, "It is vitally important that we young
people do more serious thinking ... to take them [issues like
globalization] on and give them honest thinking is the first
step to be prepared for both opportunities and challenges
coming our way". We need to respond honestly.
A competition like this draws talented students from all over
the country. And of course, I learnt more things than just
about public speaking. Since in the final analysis, public
speaking is all about effective communication. And this goes
true for all communications, whatever their setting.
And the following is the final version of my speech:
GLOBALIZATION:
OPPORTUNITIES AND CHALLENGES
FOR CHINA'S YOUNGER GENERATION
Thirty years ago, American President Richard Nixon made an
epoch-making visit to China, a country still isolated at that
time. Premier Zhou Enlai said to him, "Your handshake came
over the vastest ocean in the world—twenty-five years of no
communication". Thirty years since, China and America have
exchanged many handshakes. The fundamental implication of this
example is that the need to communicate across differences in
culture and ideology is not only felt by the two countries but
by many other nations as well.
As we can see today, environmentalists from different
countries are making joint efforts to address the issue of
global warming, economists are seeking solutions to financial
crises that rage in a particular region but nonetheless
cripple the world economy, and politicians and diplomats are
getting together to discuss the issue of combating terrorism.
Peace and prosperity has become a common goal that we are
striving for all over the world. Underlying this mighty trend
of global communication is the echo of E. M. Forster's words
"Only connect!"
With the IT revolution, traditional boundaries of human
society fall away. Our culture, politics, society and commerce
are being sloshed into one large melting pot of humanity. In
this interlinked world, there are no outsiders, for a
disturbance in one place is likely to impact other parts of
the globe. We have begun to realize that a world divided
cannot endure.
China is now actively integrating into the world. Our recent
entry to the WTO is a good example. For decades, we have taken
pride in being self-reliant, but now we realize the importance
of participating in and contributing to a broader economic
order. From a precarious role in the world arena to our
present WTO membership, we have come a long way.
But what does the way ahead look like? In some parts of the
world people are demonstrating against globalization. Are they
justified, then, in criticizing the globalizing world? Instead
of narrowing the gap between the rich and the poor, they say,
globalization enables the developed nations to swallow the
developing nations' wealth in debts and interest.
Globalization, they argue, should be about a common interest
in every other nation's economic health.
We are reminded by Karl Marx that capital goes beyond national
borders and eludes control from any other entity. This has
become a reality. Multinational corporations are seeking the
lowest cost, the largest market, and the most favourable
policy. They are often powerful lobbyists in government
decision-making, ruthless expansionists in the global market
and a devastating presence to local businesses.
For China, still more challenges exist. How are we going to
ensure a smooth transition from the planned economy to a
market-based one? How to construct a legal system that is
sound enough and broad enough to respond to the needs of a
dynamic society? How to maintain our cultural identity in an
increasingly homogeneous world? And how to define greatness in
our rise as a peace-loving nation? Globalization entails
questions that concern us all.
Like many young people my age in China, I want to see my
country get prosperous and enjoy respect in the international
community. But it seems to me that mere patriotism is not just
enough. It is vitally important that we young people do more
serious thinking and broaden our mind to bigger issues. There
might never be easy answers to those issues such as
globalization, but to take them on and give them honest
thinking is the first step to be prepared for both
opportunities and challenges coming our way. This is also one
of the thoughts that came to me while preparing this speech.
To me March 28th was a lucky day. It was on that particular
evening that I found myself at central stage, in the spotlight. Winning the "21st Century·Ericsson Cup" Seventh National English Speaking Competition is a memory that I shall treasure and one that will surely stay.
More important than winning the Cup is the friendship that has been established and developed among the contestants, and the chance to communicate offstage in addition to competing
onstage. Also the competition helps boost public speaking in China, a skill hitherto undervalued. For me, though, the competition is a more personal experience.
Habitually shy, I had been reluctant to take part in any such
activities. Encouraged by my friends, however, I made a
last-minute decision to give it a try. In the course of
preparation I somehow rediscovered myself, a truer me.
I found that, after all, I like communicating with other
people; that exchanging views can be so much fun—and so much
rewarding, both emotionally and intellectually; that public
speaking is most effective when you are least guarded; and
that it is essential to success in every walk of life.
At a more practical level, I realized knowing what you are
going to say and how you are going to say it are equally
important. To take the original ideas out of your head and
transplant them, so to speak, to that of others, you need to
have an organized mind. This ability improves with training.
Yet there should not be any loss or addition or distortion in
the process. Those ideas that finally find their way into
another head need to be recognizably yours. Language is a
means to transmit information, not a means to obstruct
communication. It should be lucid to be penetrating.
In China, certain public speaking skills have been unduly
emphasized. Will it really help, we are compelled to ask, to
bang at the podium or yell at the top of your lungs, if you
have come with a poorly organized speech, a muddled mind, and
unwillingness to truly share your views?
Above all, the single most important thing I learnt was that
as a public speaker, you need to pay attention, first and
foremost, to the content of your speech. And second, the
structure of your speech: how one idea relates and progresses
to another.
Only after these come delivery and non-verbal communication:
speed control, platform manner, and so on. Pronunciation is
important, yet of greater importance is this: Is your language
competent enough to express your ideas exactly the way you
intend them to be understood?
I was informed afterwards that I was chosen to be the winner
for my "appropriately worded speech, excellent presence and
quick-witted response". In so remarking, the judges clearly
showed their preference: they come to listen for meaningful
ideas, not for loose judgments, nor easy laughters.
Some contestants failed to address their questions head on.
Some were able to, but did not know where to stop—the dragging
on betrayed their lack of confidence. The root cause was that
they did not listen attentively to the questions. Or they were
thinking of what they had prepared.
As I said in my speech, "It is vitally important that we young
people do more serious thinking ... to take them [issues like
globalization] on and give them honest thinking is the first
step to be prepared for both opportunities and challenges
coming our way". We need to respond honestly.
A competition like this draws talented students from all over
the country. And of course, I learnt more things than just
about public speaking. Since in the final analysis, public
speaking is all about effective communication. And this goes
true for all communications, whatever their setting.
And the following is the final version of my speech:
GLOBALIZATION:
OPPORTUNITIES AND CHALLENGES
FOR CHINA'S YOUNGER GENERATION
Thirty years ago, American President Richard Nixon made an
epoch-making visit to China, a country still isolated at that
time. Premier Zhou Enlai said to him, "Your handshake came
over the vastest ocean in the world—twenty-five years of no
communication". Thirty years since, China and America have
exchanged many handshakes. The fundamental implication of this
example is that the need to communicate across differences in
culture and ideology is not only felt by the two countries but
by many other nations as well.
As we can see today, environmentalists from different
countries are making joint efforts to address the issue of
global warming, economists are seeking solutions to financial
crises that rage in a particular region but nonetheless
cripple the world economy, and politicians and diplomats are
getting together to discuss the issue of combating terrorism.
Peace and prosperity has become a common goal that we are
striving for all over the world. Underlying this mighty trend
of global communication is the echo of E. M. Forster's words
"Only connect!"
With the IT revolution, traditional boundaries of human
society fall away. Our culture, politics, society and commerce
are being sloshed into one large melting pot of humanity. In
this interlinked world, there are no outsiders, for a
disturbance in one place is likely to impact other parts of
the globe. We have begun to realize that a world divided
cannot endure.
China is now actively integrating into the world. Our recent
entry to the WTO is a good example. For decades, we have taken
pride in being self-reliant, but now we realize the importance
of participating in and contributing to a broader economic
order. From a precarious role in the world arena to our
present WTO membership, we have come a long way.
But what does the way ahead look like? In some parts of the
world people are demonstrating against globalization. Are they
justified, then, in criticizing the globalizing world? Instead
of narrowing the gap between the rich and the poor, they say,
globalization enables the developed nations to swallow the
developing nations' wealth in debts and interest.
Globalization, they argue, should be about a common interest
in every other nation's economic health.
We are reminded by Karl Marx that capital goes beyond national
borders and eludes control from any other entity. This has
become a reality. Multinational corporations are seeking the
lowest cost, the largest market, and the most favourable
policy. They are often powerful lobbyists in government
decision-making, ruthless expansionists in the global market
and a devastating presence to local businesses.
For China, still more challenges exist. How are we going to
ensure a smooth transition from the planned economy to a
market-based one? How to construct a legal system that is
sound enough and broad enough to respond to the needs of a
dynamic society? How to maintain our cultural identity in an
increasingly homogeneous world? And how to define greatness in
our rise as a peace-loving nation? Globalization entails
questions that concern us all.
Like many young people my age in China, I want to see my
country get prosperous and enjoy respect in the international
community. But it seems to me that mere patriotism is not just
enough. It is vitally important that we young people do more
serious thinking and broaden our mind to bigger issues. There
might never be easy answers to those issues such as
globalization, but to take them on and give them honest
thinking is the first step to be prepared for both
opportunities and challenges coming our way. This is also one
of the thoughts that came to me while preparing this speech.
温馨提示：内容为网友见解，仅供参考
无其他回答
相似回答
